[Bridge] [PATCH] bridge: Fix format string for %ul

Oleg Drokin green at linuxhacker.ru
Sat Aug 27 16:36:49 UTC 2016

On Aug 27, 2016, at 12:18 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

> Hello.
> On 8/27/2016 6:58 PM, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>>>> %ul would print an unsigned value and a letter l,
>>>> likely it was %lu that was meant to print the long int,
>>>> but in reality the values printed there are just regular signed
>>>  Signed? Then you need probably "%d" or "%i"…
>> They are signed in the struct definition, but in reality they
>> designate time, so could not be negative, I imagine?
>   That doesn't matter. If the type is signed, it should be printed as signed.
> Doesn't gcc complain about the format specifiers not matching the values passed?

only if the size differs.

I don't care either way.
I can change the struct to unsigned too, but if we want super correctness,
the problem lies deeper.

E.g. if we look how those times are derived, the age comes as:
static inline int br_get_ticks(const unsigned char *src)
        unsigned long ticks = get_unaligned_be16(src);

        return DIV_ROUND_UP(ticks * HZ, STP_HZ);

So we divide unsigned value by positive value and get a signed result ;)

there's a struct net_bridge_port with similar members in this are that are
unsigned long, so I guess we should convert to unsigned long in the
struct br_config_bpdu, do you want a patch for that separately or as part of this one?

>>>> ints, so just dropping the l altogether.
>>>> Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green at linuxhacker.ru>
>>> [...]
> MBR, Sergei

More information about the Bridge mailing list