[Bridge] [PATCH 07/17] net: convert sock.sk_refcnt from atomic_t to refcount_t
peterz at infradead.org
Wed Mar 22 15:08:47 UTC 2017
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 07:54:04AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 15:33 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > But I would feel a whole lot better about the entire thing if we could
> > measure their impact. It would also give us good precedent to whack
> > other potential users of _nocheck over the head with -- show numbers.
> I wont be able to measure the impact on real workloads, our productions
> kernels are based on 4.3 at this moment.
Is there really no micro bench that exercises the relevant network
paths? Do you really fully rely on Google production workloads?
> I guess someone could code a lib/test_refcount.c launching X threads
> using either atomic_inc or refcount_inc() in a loop.
> That would give a rough estimate of the refcount_t overhead among
> various platforms.
Its also a fairly meaningless number. It doesn't include any of the
other work the network path does.
More information about the Bridge