[Bridge] [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: bridge: break if __br_mdb_del fails
Nikolay Aleksandrov
nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com
Thu May 18 15:25:11 UTC 2017
On 5/18/17 6:08 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi Nikolay,
>
> Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> writes:
>
>>> err = __br_mdb_del(br, entry);
>>> - if (!err)
>>> - __br_mdb_notify(dev, p, entry, RTM_DELMDB);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + break;
>>> + __br_mdb_notify(dev, p, entry, RTM_DELMDB);
>>> }
>>> } else {
>>> err = __br_mdb_del(br, entry);
>>>
>>
>> This can potentially break user-space scripts that rely on the best-effort
>> behaviour, this is the normal "delete without vid & enabled vlan filtering".
>> You can check the fdb delete code which does the same, this was intentional.
>>
>> You can add an mdb entry without a vid to all vlans, add a vlan and then try
>> to remove it from all vlans where it is present - with this patch obviously
>> that will fail at the new vlan.
>
> OK good to know. That intention wasn't obvious. I can make __br_mdb_del
> return void instead? What about the rest of the patchset if I do so?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vivien
>
If you make it return void we will not be able to return proper error value
when doing a single operation (the else case). About the rest I see only some
minor style issues, I'll comment on the respective patches. Another minor nit is
using switch() instead of if/else for the message types but that is really up to
you, I don't mind either way. :-)
Cheers,
Nik
More information about the Bridge
mailing list