[Bridge] [PATCH net-next] bridge: mrp: Extend MRP netlink interface with IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR

Horatiu Vultur horatiu.vultur at microchip.com
Wed Jun 24 10:29:09 UTC 2020


The 06/24/2020 11:19, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 24/06/2020 11:05, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > In case the userspace daemon dies, then when is restarted it doesn't
> > know if there are any MRP instances in the kernel. Therefore extend the
> > netlink interface to allow the daemon to clear all MRP instances when is
> > started.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur at microchip.com>
> > ---
> >  include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h |  8 ++++++++
> >  net/bridge/br_mrp.c            | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >  net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c    | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  net/bridge/br_private_mrp.h    |  1 +
> >  4 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h
> > index caa6914a3e53a..2ae7d0c0d46b8 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h
> > @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ enum {
> >       IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_STATE,
> >       IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_ROLE,
> >       IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST,
> > +     IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR,
> >       __IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_MAX,
> >  };
> >
> > @@ -228,6 +229,13 @@ enum {
> >
> >  #define IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST_MAX (__IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST_MAX - 1)
> >
> > +enum {
> > +     IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR_UNSPEC,
> > +     __IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR_MAX,
> > +};
> 
> Out of curiousity - do you plan to have any clean attributes?
> In case you don't this can simply be a flag that clears the MRP instances instead
> of a nested attribute.

Currently I don't plan to add any clean attributes. But I have used the
nested attribute just in case in the future something will be needed.

> 
> > +
> > +#define IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR_MAX (__IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR_MAX - 1)
> > +
> >  struct br_mrp_instance {
> >       __u32 ring_id;
> >       __u32 p_ifindex;
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mrp.c b/net/bridge/br_mrp.c
> > index 24986ec7d38cc..02d102edaaaad 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_mrp.c
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_mrp.c
> > @@ -372,6 +372,21 @@ int br_mrp_del(struct net_bridge *br, struct br_mrp_instance *instance)
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +/* Deletes all MRP instances on the bridge
> > + * note: called under rtnl_lock
> > + */
> > +int br_mrp_clear(struct net_bridge *br)
> > +{
> > +     struct br_mrp *mrp;
> > +
> > +     list_for_each_entry_rcu(mrp, &br->mrp_list, list,
> > +                             lockdep_rtnl_is_held()) {
> > +             br_mrp_del_impl(br, mrp);
> 
> I don't think you're in RCU-protected region here, as the lockdep above confirms, which
> means br_mrp_del_impl() can free mrp and you can access freed memory while walking the list
> (trying to access of the next element).
> 
> You should be using list_for_each_entry_safe() to delete elements while walking the list.

Good catch! I will update in the next version.
> 
> Cheers,
>  Nik
> 
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* Set port state, port state can be forwarding, blocked or disabled
> >   * note: already called with rtnl_lock
> >   */
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c
> > index 34b3a8776991f..5e743538464f6 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy br_mrp_policy[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_MAX + 1] = {
> >       [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_STATE]    = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
> >       [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_ROLE]     = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
> >       [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST]    = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
> > +     [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR]         = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
> >  };
> >
> >  static const struct nla_policy
> > @@ -235,6 +236,25 @@ static int br_mrp_start_test_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct nlattr *attr,
> >       return br_mrp_start_test(br, &test);
> >  }
> >
> > +static const struct nla_policy
> > +br_mrp_clear_policy[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR_MAX + 1] = {
> > +     [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR_UNSPEC]          = { .type = NLA_REJECT },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int br_mrp_clear_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct nlattr *attr,
> > +                           struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > +{
> > +     struct nlattr *tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST_MAX + 1];
> > +     int err;
> > +
> > +     err = nla_parse_nested(tb, IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR_MAX, attr,
> > +                            br_mrp_clear_policy, extack);
> > +     if (err)
> > +             return err;
> > +
> > +     return br_mrp_clear(br);
> > +}
> > +
> >  int br_mrp_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
> >                struct nlattr *attr, int cmd, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> >  {
> > @@ -301,6 +321,12 @@ int br_mrp_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
> >                       return err;
> >       }
> >
> > +     if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR]) {
> > +             err = br_mrp_clear_parse(br, tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR], extack);
> > +             if (err)
> > +                     return err;
> > +     }
> > +
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private_mrp.h b/net/bridge/br_private_mrp.h
> > index 33b255e38ffec..25c3b8596c25b 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_private_mrp.h
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_private_mrp.h
> > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct br_mrp {
> >  /* br_mrp.c */
> >  int br_mrp_add(struct net_bridge *br, struct br_mrp_instance *instance);
> >  int br_mrp_del(struct net_bridge *br, struct br_mrp_instance *instance);
> > +int br_mrp_clear(struct net_bridge *br);
> >  int br_mrp_set_port_state(struct net_bridge_port *p,
> >                         enum br_mrp_port_state_type state);
> >  int br_mrp_set_port_role(struct net_bridge_port *p,
> >
> 

-- 
/Horatiu


More information about the Bridge mailing list