[Bridge] [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

Finn Thain fthain at telegraphics.com.au
Tue Nov 24 23:53:13 UTC 2020

On Wed, 25 Nov 2020, Miguel Ojeda wrote:

> The C standard has nothing to do with this. We use compiler extensions 
> of several kinds, for many years. Even discounting those extensions, the 
> kernel is not even conforming to C due to e.g. strict aliasing. I am not 
> sure what you are trying to argue here.

I'm saying that supporting the official language spec makes more sense 
than attempting to support a multitude of divergent interpretations of the 
spec (i.e. gcc, clang, coverity etc.)

I'm also saying that the reason why we use -std=gnu89 is that existing 
code was written in that language, not in ad hoc languages comprised of 
collections of extensions that change with every release.

> But, since you insist: yes, the `fallthrough` attribute is in the 
> current C2x draft.

Thank you for checking. I found a free version that's only 6 weeks old:


It will be interesting to see whether changes once the various 
implementations reach agreement.

More information about the Bridge mailing list