[Bridge] [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] net: mscc: ocelot: Add support for MRP
Horatiu Vultur
horatiu.vultur at microchip.com
Wed Feb 10 12:30:40 UTC 2021
The 02/10/2021 10:18, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
>
> Would you mind adding the switchdev MRP support for the DSA driver too,
> and move the code to the common ocelot library? I would like to give it
> a run. I think that's only fair, since I have to keep in sync the
> vsc7514 driver too for features that get added through DSA :)
That is totally fair. I will do it in the next version :)
>
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:21:12PM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > Add basic support for MRP. The HW will just trap all MRP frames on the
> > ring ports to CPU and allow the SW to process them. In this way it is
> > possible to for this node to behave both as MRM and MRC.
> >
> > Current limitations are:
> > - it doesn't support Interconnect roles.
> > - it supports only a single ring.
> > - the HW should be able to do forwarding of MRP Test frames so the SW
> > will not need to do this. So it would be able to have the role MRC
> > without SW support.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur at microchip.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c | 6 +
> > include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h | 6 +
> > 3 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
> > index 8f12fa45b1b5..65971403e823 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
> > @@ -9,7 +9,10 @@
> > */
> >
> > #include <linux/if_bridge.h>
> > +#include <linux/mrp_bridge.h>
> > #include <net/pkt_cls.h>
> > +#include <soc/mscc/ocelot_vcap.h>
> > +#include <uapi/linux/mrp_bridge.h>
> > #include "ocelot.h"
> > #include "ocelot_vcap.h"
> >
> > @@ -1069,6 +1072,139 @@ static int ocelot_port_obj_del_mdb(struct net_device *dev,
> > return ocelot_port_mdb_del(ocelot, port, mdb);
> > }
> >
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> > +static int ocelot_mrp_del_vcap(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port)
> > +{
> > + struct ocelot_vcap_block *block_vcap_is2;
> > + struct ocelot_vcap_filter *filter;
> > +
> > + block_vcap_is2 = &ocelot->block[VCAP_IS2];
> > + filter = ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_id(block_vcap_is2, port,
> > + false);
> > + if (!filter)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return ocelot_vcap_filter_del(ocelot, filter);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ocelot_add_mrp(struct net_device *dev,
> > + const struct switchdev_obj_mrp *mrp)
> > +{
> > + struct ocelot_port_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > + struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port = &priv->port;
> > + struct ocelot *ocelot = ocelot_port->ocelot;
> > +
> > + if (mrp->p_port != dev && mrp->s_port != dev)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (ocelot->mrp_ring_id != 0 &&
> > + ocelot->mrp_s_port &&
> > + ocelot->mrp_p_port)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (mrp->p_port == dev)
> > + ocelot->mrp_p_port = dev;
> > +
> > + if (mrp->s_port == dev)
> > + ocelot->mrp_s_port = dev;
> > +
> > + ocelot->mrp_ring_id = mrp->ring_id;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ocelot_del_mrp(struct net_device *dev,
> > + const struct switchdev_obj_mrp *mrp)
> > +{
> > + struct ocelot_port_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > + struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port = &priv->port;
> > + struct ocelot *ocelot = ocelot_port->ocelot;
> > +
> > + if (ocelot->mrp_p_port != dev && ocelot->mrp_s_port != dev)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (ocelot->mrp_ring_id == 0 &&
> > + !ocelot->mrp_s_port &&
> > + !ocelot->mrp_p_port)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (ocelot_mrp_del_vcap(ocelot, priv->chip_port))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (ocelot->mrp_p_port == dev)
> > + ocelot->mrp_p_port = NULL;
> > +
> > + if (ocelot->mrp_s_port == dev)
> > + ocelot->mrp_s_port = NULL;
> > +
> > + ocelot->mrp_ring_id = 0;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ocelot_add_ring_role(struct net_device *dev,
> > + const struct switchdev_obj_ring_role_mrp *mrp)
> > +{
> > + struct ocelot_port_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > + struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port = &priv->port;
> > + struct ocelot *ocelot = ocelot_port->ocelot;
> > + struct ocelot_vcap_filter *filter;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + if (ocelot->mrp_ring_id != mrp->ring_id)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (!mrp->sw_backup)
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > + if (ocelot->mrp_p_port != dev && ocelot->mrp_s_port != dev)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + filter = kzalloc(sizeof(*filter), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!filter)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + filter->key_type = OCELOT_VCAP_KEY_ETYPE;
> > + filter->prio = 1;
> > + filter->id.cookie = priv->chip_port;
> > + filter->id.tc_offload = false;
> > + filter->block_id = VCAP_IS2;
> > + filter->type = OCELOT_VCAP_FILTER_OFFLOAD;
> > + filter->ingress_port_mask = BIT(priv->chip_port);
> > + *(__be16 *)filter->key.etype.etype.value = htons(ETH_P_MRP);
> > + *(__be16 *)filter->key.etype.etype.mask = htons(0xffff);
> > + filter->action.mask_mode = OCELOT_MASK_MODE_PERMIT_DENY;
> > + filter->action.port_mask = 0x0;
> > + filter->action.cpu_copy_ena = true;
> > + filter->action.cpu_qu_num = 0;
> > +
> > + err = ocelot_vcap_filter_add(ocelot, filter, NULL);
> > + if (err)
> > + kfree(filter);
> > +
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ocelot_del_ring_role(struct net_device *dev,
> > + const struct switchdev_obj_ring_role_mrp *mrp)
> > +{
> > + struct ocelot_port_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > + struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port = &priv->port;
> > + struct ocelot *ocelot = ocelot_port->ocelot;
> > +
> > + if (ocelot->mrp_ring_id != mrp->ring_id)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (!mrp->sw_backup)
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > + if (ocelot->mrp_p_port != dev && ocelot->mrp_s_port != dev)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return ocelot_mrp_del_vcap(ocelot, priv->chip_port);
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
>
> Would it make sense for this chunk of conditionally compiled code to
> stay in a separate file like ocelot_mrp.c?
Also initially I was thinking to add this code in a different file but I
was not sure. But I will do that in the next version.
>
> > static int ocelot_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
> > const struct switchdev_obj *obj,
> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > @@ -1083,6 +1219,15 @@ static int ocelot_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
> > case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_MDB:
> > ret = ocelot_port_obj_add_mdb(dev, SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_MDB(obj));
> > break;
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> > + case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MRP:
> > + ret = ocelot_add_mrp(dev, SWITCHDEV_OBJ_MRP(obj));
> > + break;
> > + case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_RING_ROLE_MRP:
> > + ret = ocelot_add_ring_role(dev,
> > + SWITCHDEV_OBJ_RING_ROLE_MRP(obj));
> > + break;
> > +#endif
>
> I'm not really sure why SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MRP is conditionally defined.
> If you look at SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING, that isn't
> conditionally defined, even though it depends on CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING
> at runtime.
Then should I just create another patch for removing this? To be honest
I also prefer that SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MRP will not be conditionally
defined.
>
> > default:
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > }
> > @@ -1103,6 +1248,15 @@ static int ocelot_port_obj_del(struct net_device *dev,
> > case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_MDB:
> > ret = ocelot_port_obj_del_mdb(dev, SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_MDB(obj));
> > break;
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> > + case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MRP:
> > + ret = ocelot_del_mrp(dev, SWITCHDEV_OBJ_MRP(obj));
> > + break;
> > + case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_RING_ROLE_MRP:
> > + ret = ocelot_del_ring_role(dev,
> > + SWITCHDEV_OBJ_RING_ROLE_MRP(obj));
> > + break;
> > +#endif
> > default:
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
> > index 6b6eb92149ba..96a9c9f98060 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
> > @@ -698,6 +698,12 @@ static irqreturn_t ocelot_xtr_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> > skb->offload_fwd_mark = 1;
> >
> > skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev);
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> > + if (skb->protocol == ntohs(ETH_P_MRP) &&
> > + (priv->dev == ocelot->mrp_p_port ||
> > + priv->dev == ocelot->mrp_s_port))
> > + skb->offload_fwd_mark = 0;
> > +#endif
>
> I wonder if you could just reserve a certain CPUQ for trapped traffic,
> and just generically check for that, instead of MRP port roles?
That is a good idea, I would try to have a look.
>
> > if (!skb_defer_rx_timestamp(skb))
> > netif_rx(skb);
> > dev->stats.rx_bytes += len;
> > diff --git a/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h b/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h
> > index d0d48e9620fb..d95c019ad84e 100644
> > --- a/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h
> > +++ b/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h
> > @@ -682,6 +682,12 @@ struct ocelot {
> > /* Protects the PTP clock */
> > spinlock_t ptp_clock_lock;
> > struct ptp_pin_desc ptp_pins[OCELOT_PTP_PINS_NUM];
> > +
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> > + u16 mrp_ring_id;
> > + struct net_device *mrp_p_port;
> > + struct net_device *mrp_s_port;
> > +#endif
> > };
> >
> > struct ocelot_policer {
> > --
> > 2.27.0
> >
--
/Horatiu
More information about the Bridge
mailing list