[cgl_discussion] CGL and DCL trees

[Mika Kukkonen]

On ke, 2002-12-11 at 08:39, Timothy D. Witham wrote:
(...)
> As for these trees intending to be the definitive trees
> for the CGL and DCL projects.  That is true they are
> intended to be the main trees.

Just to hammer the point through: Randy's and Steve's kernel
trees are _the_ CGL and DCL trees, and the names of those trees
will be unchanged. If somebody wants to start their own kernel
tree, fine, as long as you rename it to "2.5.51-cgl_mytree" or
something like that (assuming you derive it from Randy's tree).

Obligatory film quotes:
	"There can be only one!"
	"One" tree "to bind them all ..."

--MiKu