[cgl_discussion] CGL and DCL trees

[Skip Ford]

Mika Kukkonen wrote:
> On ke, 2002-12-11 at 08:39, Timothy D. Witham wrote:
> (...)
> > As for these trees intending to be the definitive trees
> > for the CGL and DCL projects.  That is true they are
> > intended to be the main trees.
> 
> Just to hammer the point through: Randy's and Steve's kernel
> trees are _the_ CGL and DCL trees, and the names of those trees
> will be unchanged. If somebody wants to start their own kernel
> tree, fine, as long as you rename it to "2.5.51-cgl_mytree" or
> something like that (assuming you derive it from Randy's tree).

That makes no sense.  If I start a tree that intends to meet the
requirements established by the CGL Working Group, I have every right to
call it -cgl also regardless of whether it's derived from Randy's tree.

-- 
Skip