[cgl_discussion] CGL and DCL trees

[Skip Ford]

Sousou, Imad wrote:
> the problem is trying to re-define what open source is; and creating
> parallel ways of doing things for open source development doesn't exactly
> help us.  I agree with you on the "arrogance" comment... especially around
> comments like "We can do whatever we want"...

Wait a minute, aren't you both members of the group you're calling
arrogant?  (IBM and intel?)

> anyway, this discussion is raising my blood pressure... so i'm signing off
> /i

-- 
Skip