[cgl_discussion] CGL and DCL trees

Skip Ford skip.ford at verizon.net
Wed Dec 11 15:07:33 PST 2002

Skip Ford wrote:
> As for LKCD, I know it's on your feature list, but I had in my tree for
> a while as you know, and I finally just got rid of it.  I found it to be
> slow and intrusive.  But I also don't think it'll be accepted so it has
> to be in your cgl tree I guess.  I just wonder if it wouldn't be possible
> to write a non-intrusive version that is only slow when you're actually
> tracing that's based on kprobes.  Seems possible, but a lot of work.

This entire paragragh is actually referring to LTT not LKCD :(


More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list