[cgl_discussion] CGL and DCL trees

Shureih, Tariq tariq.shureih at intel.com
Wed Dec 11 16:06:13 PST 2002

I will second and third this and PLEASE let's drop this argument, I can't
keep up with all the mailing lists.

Way to go John, leave it to a hacker to figure things out ;-)

Tariq Shureih
Intel Corporation
Opinions are my own and don't represent my emplyer

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Dake [mailto:sdake at mvista.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:59 PM
To: Villalovos, John L
Cc: cgl_discussion at osdl.org
Subject: Re: [cgl_discussion] CGL and DCL trees

This seems like a reasonable idea unless OSDL is getting into the linux 
vendor business.


Villalovos, John L wrote:

>Okay maybe I'm being simplistic in my solution but...
>Why not call it the either the -rd tree or the -rd-cgl tree.
>That way it implies that is is Randy Dunlap's tree and not some
>quasi-official tree.
>Just my $0.02 :)
>John Villalovos
>Intel Corporation 
>BEAVERTON, OR  97006-5723
>(503) 677-5777   Fax: (503) 677-6670
>GPG 1.+/PGP 5.+/ DSS/Diffie Helman
>1024D/1A25D86C 2F24 AD89 E5D5 C92B 7FE2  F878 7ED5 2D38 1A25 D86C
>"The VCR, is to the American film producer and the American public as the
>Boston strangler is to a woman home alone." - Jack Valenti, chairman of the
>Motion Picture Association of America.
>My opinions are my own and NEVER the opinions of Intel Corporation.  I am
>but a tiny, insignificant, infinitesimal (1/60000) cog in the giant machine
>of Intel :)  
>cgl_discussion mailing list
>cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org

cgl_discussion mailing list
cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org

More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list