[cgl_discussion] 12/12/02 Concall Minutes

Steven Dake sdake at mvista.com
Thu Dec 12 11:25:06 PST 2002


Andy Pfiffer wrote:

>POC Meeting Minutes
>Dec. 12, 2002
>
>Scribe
>	Andy (andyp at osdl.org)
>
>Attendees
>	Nokia: Rod, Johannes
>	Intel: Ram, Terrence
>	IBM: Venkat
>	OSDL: Andy, Mika, John, Mark, Randy
>
>Discussion
>    Unscheduled Opens: None.
>
>    From The Agenda
>        > Update from F2F (Mika)
>		- minutes have been published via email; some on call
>		  did not receive it.
>AR 12/12:	- Mikka will re-send.
>
>	> Old Action Items
>
>	    * Sistina LVM status (Rod)
>		- Reports that Sistina wants to get users onto LVM2,
>		  and off of LVM1.
>		- 10's of K-users on LVM1, and at least some are pressing
>		  the limits.
>		- LVM2 considered stable, and nearly ready for formal
>		  release; waiting for missing "pvmove" utility.
>		  Once complete, will releas 1.0 LVM2.
>	
>
LVM2 kernel patch and utilities are GPL.

Thanks
-steve

>	- Q: Randy: GPL or commericial
>		- A: Rod/John: LVM1 == GPL, LVM2 == Unknown,
>		     CVM (clustered): commercial
>		- Q: is LVM2 a user-space thing? Kernel patch?
>		- A: set of user tools, and a kernel component (maybe)
>		     [unknown kernel version requirement]
>AR 12/12:	- Rod w/ check & report on kernel requirements of LVM2
>		  kernel component, if any.
>
>	    * Lisa was to check on the possibility of patch set
>	      for storage.
>		- No update available during the meeting.
>
>	    * Randy was going to report on a patch set for tools.
>		- Randy/John: "safe to say 'Yes, we'll [OSDL] do that.'"
>		- May be delivered in the OSDL patchset.
>		- Randy/John:
>		    currently includes:
>			LKCD, probes, LTT
>		    not currently included:
>			kernel debugger
>AR 12/12:	- John: will report what is/is-not included and report back.
>
>	    * John: Jeff was looking at POSIX patch set...
>		- Response: Terrence: status:
>			1. Includes timer, signals, message queues.
>			   not a "full posix" patch set.
>			2. development is on track per plan.
>
>		- Comment: Ram: feedback on LKML Re: open POSIX testing
>		  was good.  The open project will be a repository for
>			POSIX patch set as well as POSIX tests.
>AR 12/12:	- Rod & Ram: will send summary info to andyp for inclusion
>		  in this week's minutes.
>
>	    * Johannes update on GPL & code at Nokia
>		- "light green light, not yet a full green light"
>		- working w/ Nokia legal on details, and waiting.
>
>	    * Rod: update on "Feature Set 2 - Networking #1"
>		- all features appear to be in 2.5 (pretty sure),
>		   but not everything in 2.4.
>AR 12/12:	- Rod: will double check the details report back.
>
>	    * Get everyone back in gear.
>		- Ram: will send out projects list.
>		- Rod: re: patch sets
>			 - need to keep beating the bushes for people
>			   to sign up for features that they care about.
>
>	    * Venkat: update on IPv6 (FS4, Net2)
>		- core ipv6 features accepted into 2.4 and 2.5
>		- not a replacement, is an add-on to existing ipv6
>		  (ehancements, bugfixes).
>		- re: ipsec for ipv6:
>			1. submitted, but mainline networking
>			   maintainers wanted to have a common
>			   infrastructure for ipv4 and ipv6.
>			2. ipsec for ipv4 exists in 2.5, but not for ipv6.
>		- mobile ipv6 submitted, mainline maintainers waiting
>		  for completion of common infrastructure (ipv4 & ipv6)
>		  for ipsec.
>		- maintainers agreeing to take two components with
>		  some changes.
>
>
>	    * Rod: current list of feature sets was approved at last
>	       tech-board meeting.
>
>	    * December Progress and Holiday plans
>		- will have call: Dec. 19, 2002.
>			0. review open AR's
>			1. update project table.
>			2. update status.
>		- NO CALL: Dec. 26 2002
>		- NO CALL: Jan.  2 2003
>
>Old Open AR's
>AR 11/21: Geoff - Follow up on the status (2.4 & 2.5) of POSIX-compliant
>	  message queue interfaces.
>AR 11/21: Team - feedback to Dave on Feature Set representation tool.
>AR 11/21: Team - feedback to Rod on patch set strawman format/content.
>
>_______________________________________________
>cgl_discussion mailing list
>cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
>http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion
>
>
>
>  
>




More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list