[cgl_discussion] 12/12/02 Concall Minutes
Chen, Terence
terence.chen at intel.com
Thu Dec 19 09:05:50 PST 2002
Andy, Rod,
Here is the status of POSIX patch set Action Item I own
The Open POSIX Test Suite Project (http://posixtest.sourceforge.net) will
have the source available early next year at http://posixtest.bkbits.net of
various POSIX implementations (for POSIX Thread, Timer, Mutex, Signal, and
Semaphore) in the context of posixtest project.
-Terence
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Pfiffer [mailto:andyp at osdl.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 11:07 AM
To: cgl_discussion at osdl.org
Subject: [cgl_discussion] 12/12/02 Concall Minutes
POC Meeting Minutes
Dec. 12, 2002
Scribe
Andy (andyp at osdl.org)
Attendees
Nokia: Rod, Johannes
Intel: Ram, Terrence
IBM: Venkat
OSDL: Andy, Mika, John, Mark, Randy
Discussion
Unscheduled Opens: None.
From The Agenda
> Update from F2F (Mika)
- minutes have been published via email; some on call
did not receive it.
AR 12/12: - Mikka will re-send.
> Old Action Items
* Sistina LVM status (Rod)
- Reports that Sistina wants to get users onto LVM2,
and off of LVM1.
- 10's of K-users on LVM1, and at least some are pressing
the limits.
- LVM2 considered stable, and nearly ready for formal
release; waiting for missing "pvmove" utility.
Once complete, will releas 1.0 LVM2.
- Q: Randy: GPL or commericial
- A: Rod/John: LVM1 == GPL, LVM2 == Unknown,
CVM (clustered): commercial
- Q: is LVM2 a user-space thing? Kernel patch?
- A: set of user tools, and a kernel component (maybe)
[unknown kernel version requirement]
AR 12/12: - Rod w/ check & report on kernel requirements of LVM2
kernel component, if any.
* Lisa was to check on the possibility of patch set
for storage.
- No update available during the meeting.
* Randy was going to report on a patch set for tools.
- Randy/John: "safe to say 'Yes, we'll [OSDL] do that.'"
- May be delivered in the OSDL patchset.
- Randy/John:
currently includes:
LKCD, probes, LTT
not currently included:
kernel debugger
AR 12/12: - John: will report what is/is-not included and report back.
* John: Jeff was looking at POSIX patch set...
- Response: Terrence: status:
1. Includes timer, signals, message queues.
not a "full posix" patch set.
2. development is on track per plan.
- Comment: Ram: feedback on LKML Re: open POSIX testing
was good. The open project will be a repository for
POSIX patch set as well as POSIX tests.
AR 12/12: - Rod & Ram: will send summary info to andyp for inclusion
in this week's minutes.
* Johannes update on GPL & code at Nokia
- "light green light, not yet a full green light"
- working w/ Nokia legal on details, and waiting.
* Rod: update on "Feature Set 2 - Networking #1"
- all features appear to be in 2.5 (pretty sure),
but not everything in 2.4.
AR 12/12: - Rod: will double check the details report back.
* Get everyone back in gear.
- Ram: will send out projects list.
- Rod: re: patch sets
- need to keep beating the bushes for people
to sign up for features that they care about.
* Venkat: update on IPv6 (FS4, Net2)
- core ipv6 features accepted into 2.4 and 2.5
- not a replacement, is an add-on to existing ipv6
(ehancements, bugfixes).
- re: ipsec for ipv6:
1. submitted, but mainline networking
maintainers wanted to have a common
infrastructure for ipv4 and ipv6.
2. ipsec for ipv4 exists in 2.5, but not for ipv6.
- mobile ipv6 submitted, mainline maintainers waiting
for completion of common infrastructure (ipv4 & ipv6)
for ipsec.
- maintainers agreeing to take two components with
some changes.
* Rod: current list of feature sets was approved at last
tech-board meeting.
* December Progress and Holiday plans
- will have call: Dec. 19, 2002.
0. review open AR's
1. update project table.
2. update status.
- NO CALL: Dec. 26 2002
- NO CALL: Jan. 2 2003
Old Open AR's
AR 11/21: Geoff - Follow up on the status (2.4 & 2.5) of POSIX-compliant
message queue interfaces.
AR 11/21: Team - feedback to Dave on Feature Set representation tool.
AR 11/21: Team - feedback to Rod on patch set strawman format/content.
_______________________________________________
cgl_discussion mailing list
cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion
More information about the cgl_discussion
mailing list