[cgl_discussion] PoC concall, 10:00 PST, 14 Nov
Cress, Andrew R
andrew.r.cress at intel.com
Thu Nov 14 08:38:14 PST 2002
There is some overlap here.
RAID Support (scsirastools) includes support for hot-swap of SCSI drives,
is not dependent upon any of the 4 items below.
However, scsirastools does not currently include FC hot-swap, or LVM fixes.
We need to talk about synergies and compatibility.
I guess these features need to be grouped under a common Feature Set
From: Steven Dake [mailto:sdake at mvista.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Peddibhotla, Rammohan
Cc: cgl_discussion at osdl.org
Subject: Re: [cgl_discussion] PoC concall, 10:00 PST, 14 Nov
You seem to have missed four important items:
1. block device hot remove @ www.sourceforge.net/projects/atca-hotswap
(not yet there, coming soon)
2. scsi&fc midlayer hot add and hot remove @
3. cluster aware multidisk driver (raid and LVM) @ no project page yet
4. forcibly unmounting filesystems @ no project page yet (mark huth is
#1, #2, #4 are required for hotswap of scsi/fc targets to work properly.
#3 is specified somewhere in the CGL specifications.
Also, in your hot insert and hot remove areas (#11, #12) you should
probably refer to PICMG as PICMG 2.12. Compact PCI hotswap shouldn't be
confused with Advanced TCA hotswap.
Peddibhotla, Rammohan wrote:
>Here's the doc in its current state.. I'm in the process of collecting info
>on a bunch of projects..
>From: Rod.VanMeter at nokia.com [mailto:Rod.VanMeter at nokia.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 2:25 PM
>To: cgl_discussion at osdl.org
>Subject: [cgl_discussion] PoC concall, 10:00 PST, 14 Nov
>Agenda for tomorrow's PoC concall:
>* review my list of things to do by Dec 4
>* beat the bushes for patch set maintainers
>* go over Ram's list of projects (regardless
> of completeness)
> Toll Free: 1.800.482.3251
> International: 1.719.457.5113
> Pass Code: 548726
>cgl_discussion mailing list
>cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
cgl_discussion mailing list
cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
More information about the cgl_discussion