[cgl_discussion] CGL Feature Sets List (new)
rddunlap at osdl.org
Thu Nov 21 10:51:24 PST 2002
There are core 2.0 features that are being
implemented in 1.1, and I thought that we decided that
(a) that's ok and (b) we should track those in 1.1.
IOW, if it's merged now, there's no reason to delay
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Peddibhotla, Rammohan wrote:
| Yes, it is in the requirements doc as # 1.8, but is marked
| core 2.0.
| Wouldn't it be better to capture only core/configurable
| 1.1 items in the "CGL 1.1 projects" doc and start another
| for 2.0 features? Makes for a clean seperation..
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Randy.Dunlap [mailto:rddunlap at osdl.org]
| Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:00 AM
| To: Rod.VanMeter at nokia.com
| Cc: dave at osdl.org; cgl_discussion at osdl.org
| Subject: RE: [cgl_discussion] CGL Feature Sets List (new)
| On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 Rod.VanMeter at nokia.com wrote:
| | Thanks for the catches on the missing features.
| | Ram and I had already noticed that SCTP is in the FS list,
| | but not in the requirements doc, which is why it's not in
| | Ram's list. It *IS* in the "marketing requirements" doc
| | for 2.0.
| | > -----Original Message-----
| | > From: ext Dave Fuller [mailto:dave at osdl.org]
| | >
| | > - SCTP appears in the feature set list but is not in Ram's document.
| What requirements spec are you looking at?
| SCTP is in section 3.10, page 20, Priority 2, of version 0.5 of the
| Reqs. spec., later re-numbered as section 1.8 of the same version. :)
| It is section 1.8 in CGL requirement definition 1.0, 1.1 draft, and 1.1
| not_draft versions. Still priority 2.
More information about the cgl_discussion