[cgl_discussion] Process problem? [recent KDB password checkins]

Mika Kukkonen mika at osdl.org
Tue Oct 1 10:10:35 PDT 2002

I think the problem here is that in 1.0 specs KDB password was
considered independent feature, but now in 1.1 is is part of KDB
feature. So the solution to the problem below is that current
KDB maintainer "gives" KDB password "ex-maintainer" CVS access rights.


On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 09:59, Andy Pfiffer wrote:
> I've got a question about out development process...
> This morning, 4 commits to the CVS tree took place that did not go
> through the maintainer.
> Didn't we agree that only maintainers or those designated by maintainers
> should be permitted to commit to the tree?
> Thanks,
> Andy
> _______________________________________________
> cgl_discussion mailing list
> cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
> http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion

More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list