[cgl_discussion] Process problem? [recent KDB password checkins]
rddunlap at osdl.org
Tue Oct 1 10:15:48 PDT 2002
On 1 Oct 2002, Mika Kukkonen wrote:
| I think the problem here is that in 1.0 specs KDB password was
| considered independent feature, but now in 1.1 is is part of KDB
| feature. So the solution to the problem below is that current
| KDB maintainer "gives" KDB password "ex-maintainer" CVS access rights.
That's certainly one way to do it.
Or patches can go thru the project maintainer.
In either case, there should be some coordination between/among them.
| On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 09:59, Andy Pfiffer wrote:
| > I've got a question about out development process...
| > This morning, 4 commits to the CVS tree took place that did not go
| > through the maintainer.
| > Didn't we agree that only maintainers or those designated by maintainers
| > should be permitted to commit to the tree?
| > Thanks,
| > Andy
| > _______________________________________________
More information about the cgl_discussion