[cgl_discussion] Process problem? [recent KDB password check ins]

Larry Butler larry_butler at hp.com
Tue Oct 1 10:22:52 PDT 2002


OK, but what exactly are you agreeing about?

BTW, I am the password patch maintainer (or whatever it's called).

On Tuesday 01 October 2002 11:18 am, Shureih, Tariq wrote:
> I agree with Mika.
> 
> Andy, any objections?
> 
> Larry, are you ok with that?
> 
> --
> Tariq ¤
> -^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-
> Opinions are my own and do NOT
> represent those of Intel Corporation.
> ^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy.Dunlap [mailto:rddunlap at osdl.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:12 AM
> To: Shureih, Tariq
> Cc: 'Andy Pfiffer'; cgl_discussion at osdl.org; 'Larry_butler at hp.com'
> Subject: RE: [cgl_discussion] Process problem? [recent KDB password check
> ins]
> 
> | Isn't he the maintainer?
> 
> No, Larry isn't the kernel debugger maintainer.
> 
> ~Randy
> 
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Shureih, Tariq wrote:
> 
> | I got this email from Larry Butler:
> | Hi,
> |
> | The developers guide says to fillout a "transmittal" form and send it
> here,
> | but I can't find the template in 'docs'.
> |
> | So I'm sending this note.
> |
> | I've checked in the kdb password patch ind
> | kernel/linux-2.4.18/patches/kdb/kdb_auth.patch.
> |
> | Also, Dann has checked in systemimager in components/systemimager which is
> | for
> | the live upgrade requirement and possibly others.
> |
> | Thanks,
> | Larry
> |
> |
> | Isn't he the maintainer?
> |
> | --
> | Tariq ¤
> | -^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-
> | Opinions are my own and do NOT
> | represent those of Intel Corporation.
> | ^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-
> |
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: Andy Pfiffer [mailto:andyp at osdl.org]
> | Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:59 AM
> | To: cgl_discussion at osdl.org
> | Subject: [cgl_discussion] Process problem? [recent KDB password checkins]
> |
> | I've got a question about out development process...
> |
> | This morning, 4 commits to the CVS tree took place that did not go
> | through the maintainer.
> |
> | Didn't we agree that only maintainers or those designated by maintainers
> | should be permitted to commit to the tree?
> |
> | Thanks,
> | Andy
> | _______________________________________________
> 
> 




More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list