[cgl_discussion] empty checkin comments?

Lynch, Rusty rusty.lynch at intel.com
Wed Oct 9 10:29:49 PDT 2002


hmmm... Looks like most (or is it all) of the check-ins were cglvalidation 
related.  I'll post a reminder for descriptive cvs comments to all the 
validation maintainers.

	-rusty

-----Original Message-----
From: Shureih, Tariq [mailto:tariq.shureih at intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:24 AM
To: 'Neil Bliss'; cgl_discussion at osdl.org
Subject: RE: [cgl_discussion] empty checkin comments?


That's a good question and a major concern of mine.

Integration generates change logs and "bug" logs with every build.  We can't
have vague or incomplete check-in messages.



--
Tariq ¤
-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-
Opinions are my own and do NOT
represent those of Intel Corporation.
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Bliss [mailto:nbliss at mvista.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:04 AM
To: cgl_discussion at osdl.org
Subject: [cgl_discussion] empty checkin comments?

Hey folks,

I don't mean to be a pain, but why do a lot of the cgle checkins lately have
empty or highly cryptic comments?  The empty ones concern me the most.

back into lurk-mode,

Neil

-- 
Neil Bliss - MontaVista Technical Support
Yow!-Zippy-says: I just remembered something about a TOAD!
_______________________________________________
cgl_discussion mailing list
cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion
_______________________________________________
cgl_discussion mailing list
cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion



More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list