[cgl_discussion] Proposal to replace Resource Monitor with Performance Co-Pilot

Davis, Todd C todd.c.davis at intel.com
Fri Oct 18 11:26:41 PDT 2002

Attached is a comparison of the Resource Monitor and SGI's Performance
Co-Pilot (PCP). Because of PCP has
1. Superior monitoring capabilities
2. Access many more system metrics
3. Fully developed archive logging feature
4. Application trace facility
5. No dependence on the event log package
I propose that PCP be used in the next release of GCLE in place of the
Resource Monitor.
CGLE 1.0 requirements that PCP satisfies:
Requirement: 4.1.2 Resource Monitor Framework
Requirement: 4.1.3 Resource Monitor Subsystems
Requirement: 4.1.4 Resource Monitor Data Persistence
Requirement: 4.1.5 Resource Monitor Performance

Todd C. Davis
These are my opinions and absolutely not official opinions of Intel Corp.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PCPcomparison.ZIP
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 39530 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/cgl_discussion/attachments/20021018/29bfa9c6/PCPcomparison-0001.obj

More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list