[cgl_discussion] Check in logs for recent CVS check-ins

Villalovos, John L john.l.villalovos at intel.com
Fri Sep 6 11:05:58 PDT 2002

Too be honest in my humble opinion I think it would have been a better idea
to sync the repositories and then all the history is there for what happened
after Aug 15th.  I have other reasons that I think we should sync the
repository too :)


John Villalovos
Intel Corporation 
BEAVERTON, OR  97006-5723
(503) 677-5777   Fax: (503) 677-6670

GPG 1.+/PGP 5.+/ DSS/Diffie Helman
1024D/1A25D86C 2F24 AD89 E5D5 C92B 7FE2  F878 7ED5 2D38 1A25 D86C

"The VCR, is to the American film producer and the American public as the
Boston strangler is to a woman home alone." - Jack Valenti, chairman of the
Motion Picture Association of America.

My opinions are my own and NEVER the opinions of Intel Corporation.  I am
but a tiny, insignificant, infinitesimal (1/60000) cog in the giant machine
of Intel :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Khalid Aziz [mailto:khalid at fc.hp.com]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:47 AM
To: 'cgl_discussion at osdl.org'
Subject: [cgl_discussion] Check in logs for recent CVS check-ins

I have been looking at the recent check-ins into CVS and the log
messages for a number of those check-ins simply say "Changes since Aug
15", or "sync from TLT trek2 9/6/02". This breaks the rules set forth in
developer's guide on page 12 which says that when checking in code for a
bugfix , the log must refer to a bug number in bugzilla. If these
check-ins were not for bugfixes, they were rather functionality
enhancement, a more descriptive log would be extremely helpful.


Khalid Aziz                                   Linux Systems Division
(970)898-9214                                        Hewlett-Packard
khalid at fc.hp.com                                    Fort Collins, CO

"The Linux kernel is subject to relentless development" 
				- Alessandro Rubini
cgl_discussion mailing list
cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org

More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list