[cgl_discussion] Re: Buffer overflow
greg at kroah.com
Thu Apr 24 08:57:32 PDT 2003
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 08:22:05AM -0700, Mika Kukkonen wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 17:23, Greg KH wrote:
> > And there's things like the StackGuard or ProPolice gcc patches that
> > might be better to point people at. However, that's not a kernel
> > patch/feature, so would not fall under the CGL spec :)
> Where did you get that idea? Already in v1.1 spec most of our features
> are non-kernel.
Ah, my mistake, sorry.
Ok then, why not specify a specific version of gcc (like the above
mentioned versions) if you all really want to worry about something like
More information about the cgl_discussion