[cgl_discussion] libevent & epoll
rddunlap at osdl.org
Thu Aug 14 08:12:27 PDT 2003
The only comparison that I know of (from the epoll maintainer)
is at http://www.xmailserver.org/linux-patches/nio-improve.html .
Besides libevent, there is also
http://liboop.org/ (I don't think this one helps much)
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:52:42 +0200 Eric.Chacron at alcatel.fr wrote:
| >I think that I mentioned it several months ago.
| >My faint recollection of it is that the AEM people said that it's not
| >sufficient, maybe doesn't do task switching fast enough.
| Is there any benchmark to compare AEM, libevent , POSIX AIO, SIGIO, select
| /poll () ...
| for asynchronous events handling ? Then we 'll have a beter understanding
| on the added value of each one ...
| "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap at osdl.org>@lists.osdl.org on 08/14/2003 05:15:55 AM
| Sent by: cgl_discussion-admin at lists.osdl.org
| To: <tabmowzo at us.ibm.com>
| cc: <mika at osdl.org>, <cgl_discussion at osdl.org>
| Subject: Re: [cgl_discussion] libevent & epoll
| > Mika Kukkonen wrote:
| >> Re: our Ottawa discussion about AEM and a library on top of /dev/epoll
| >> I have a faint recollection that somebody months ago mentioned this:
| >> http://monkey.org/~provos/libevent/
| >> Does anybody still remember why it was not an alternative to AEM?
| > Um, because we forgot it existed? At least, I don't have any memory of
| I think that I mentioned it several months ago.
| My faint recollection of it is that the AEM people said that it's not
| sufficient, maybe doesn't do task switching fast enough.
More information about the cgl_discussion