[Fwd: Re: [cgl_discussion] Top 10 projects]

Steven Dake sdake at mvista.com
Wed Aug 20 08:54:22 PDT 2003


Top 10 list reforwarded

-----Forwarded Message-----
> From: Steven Dake <sdake at mvista.com>
> To: "Fleischer, Julie N" <julie.n.fleischer at intel.com>
> Cc: cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
> Subject: Re: [cgl_discussion] Top 10 projects
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:06:02 -0700
> 
> 
> 
> Fleischer, Julie N wrote:
> 
> >>AR Julie to determine top 10 projects in need of help to meet
> >>  priority 1 requirements.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Here's the top 10 projects I found where it seems resources may be needed to get to Production quality for CGL 2.0.  I'm sending it out now for discussion before next week's POC.
> >
> >TOP 10
> >======
> >POSIX Message Passing -> We don't have distro input on this one, and we don't have data on how much each of the two implementations implements the requirement.  I'm presenting some additional analysis at the next POC.
> >
> >Persistent Device Naming -> Neither project listed appears to implement full requirement.  One is being worked on, but isn't listed yet.
> >
> >IPMI 1.5 -> Seems to implement requirement, but needs help getting stable.
> >
> >Software Remote Update -> Appears to have distro-specific requirements tied to it.  Unclear which option is available for distros that implements full requirement.
> >
> >Soft Realtime Support Performance -> Need to understand how we will implement this (or if it already is implemented).
> >
> >Asynchronous Events -> AEM is the only one designed to meet full requirement, but isn't stable yet.
> >
> >Cluster Node Failure Detection -> Need to ensure one of these projects is ready by CGL 2.0.
> >
> >Communication Service/Logical Addressing and Fault Handling ->  Need to ensure one of these projects is ready by CGL 2.0.
> >
> >Multipath Access to Storage -> Not sure name/location of IBM project or how well it implements the reuqirement.
> >  
> >
> Multipath is also standard in the 2.4 and 2.6 kernels via the MD 
> driver.  While the implementation has specific problems, it does work 
> for the variety of cases.  It does need some modification to meet the 
> full requirement.  The IBM SCSI multipathing has less problems, but also 
> needs some work to meet the full requirements.
> 
> Hope this helps
> -steve
> 
> >IPSec for IPV4/Support for IKE -> Need to ensure the current implementations really meet the requirement.
> >
> >- Julie
> >
> >**These views are not necessarily those of my employer.**
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >cgl_discussion mailing list
> >cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
> >http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cgl_discussion mailing list
> cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
> http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion
> 
> 




More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list