[Fwd: Re: [cgl_discussion] Top 10 projects]

[Fleischer, Julie N]

One note is that this changed a bit based on input from others.  For the F2F, the list became the one at http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/cgl_discussion/2003-July/001417.html.  This list did change as a result of the F2F, though.

Based on reading the POC minutes, it looks like we're planning on adding to this list?  One item I was wondering if we could add is Multipath IO since work still needs to be done on the only reference project for this requirement.

- Julie

**These views are not necessarily those of my employer.**


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Dake [mailto:sdake at mvista.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:54 AM
> To: cgl_discussion at osdl.org
> Subject: [Fwd: Re: [cgl_discussion] Top 10 projects]
> 
> 
> Top 10 list reforwarded
> 
> -----Forwarded Message-----
> > From: Steven Dake <sdake at mvista.com>
> > To: "Fleischer, Julie N" <julie.n.fleischer at intel.com>
> > Cc: cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
> > Subject: Re: [cgl_discussion] Top 10 projects
> > Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:06:02 -0700
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Fleischer, Julie N wrote:
> > 
> > >>AR Julie to determine top 10 projects in need of help to meet
> > >>  priority 1 requirements.
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >
> > >Here's the top 10 projects I found where it seems 
> resources may be needed to get to Production quality for CGL 
> 2.0.  I'm sending it out now for discussion before next week's POC.
> > >
> > >TOP 10
> > >======
> > >POSIX Message Passing -> We don't have distro input on 
> this one, and we don't have data on how much each of the two 
> implementations implements the requirement.  I'm presenting 
> some additional analysis at the next POC.
> > >
> > >Persistent Device Naming -> Neither project listed appears 
> to implement full requirement.  One is being worked on, but 
> isn't listed yet.
> > >
> > >IPMI 1.5 -> Seems to implement requirement, but needs help 
> getting stable.
> > >
> > >Software Remote Update -> Appears to have distro-specific 
> requirements tied to it.  Unclear which option is available 
> for distros that implements full requirement.
> > >
> > >Soft Realtime Support Performance -> Need to understand 
> how we will implement this (or if it already is implemented).
> > >
> > >Asynchronous Events -> AEM is the only one designed to 
> meet full requirement, but isn't stable yet.
> > >
> > >Cluster Node Failure Detection -> Need to ensure one of 
> these projects is ready by CGL 2.0.
> > >
> > >Communication Service/Logical Addressing and Fault 
> Handling ->  Need to ensure one of these projects is ready by CGL 2.0.
> > >
> > >Multipath Access to Storage -> Not sure name/location of 
> IBM project or how well it implements the reuqirement.
> > >  
> > >
> > Multipath is also standard in the 2.4 and 2.6 kernels via the MD 
> > driver.  While the implementation has specific problems, it 
> does work 
> > for the variety of cases.  It does need some modification 
> to meet the 
> > full requirement.  The IBM SCSI multipathing has less 
> problems, but also 
> > needs some work to meet the full requirements.
> > 
> > Hope this helps
> > -steve
> > 
> > >IPSec for IPV4/Support for IKE -> Need to ensure the 
> current implementations really meet the requirement.
> > >
> > >- Julie
> > >
> > >**These views are not necessarily those of my employer.**
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >cgl_discussion mailing list
> > >cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
> > >http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > cgl_discussion mailing list
> > cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
> > http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cgl_discussion mailing list
> cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
> http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion
>