[cgl_discussion] POSIX requirements question for TEMs/ISVs/OEMs

Howell, David P david.p.howell at intel.com
Tue Feb 4 10:44:03 PST 2003

Typically a full feature set would be included, and there would be the
POSIX feature set define to indicate it's presence in an implementation.
Mutex is under the POSIX threads extension (_POSIX_THREADS) already.

Another feature sets we've heard about would be the real-time scheduling
feature set that Inaky has brought up in cgl_discussion.

Dave Howell 

These are my opinions and not official opinions of Intel Corp.

David Howell
Intel Corporation
Telco Server Development
Server Products Division
Voice: (803) 461-6112  Fax: (803) 461-6292

Intel Corporation
Columbia Design Center, CBA-2
250 Berryhill Road, Suite 100
Columbia, SC 29210

david.p.howell at intel.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Chen, Terence 
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:20 PM
To: cgl discussion
Cc: 'Pradeep Kathail'
Subject: [cgl_discussion] POSIX requirements question for TEMs/ISVs/OEMs


As we are working on the CGL 2.0 requirements spec, I have a POSIX
requirements question that will need your help. Your input is extremely
important especially if your telecom application is currently relies on
POSIX functions .....

Currently CGL 1.1 spec listed 6 POSIX interface (objects) APIs
compliance as
requirements. They are Timer, Signal, Message Queue, Semaphore, and

Question: What are other POSIX objects that your telecom application
on that we should consider to add to CGL 2.0 spec as new requirements?
example, we might consider to add Mutex (under <pthread.h> ). Is there



These are my opinions and absolutely not official opinions of Intel
cgl_discussion mailing list
cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org

More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list