[cgl_discussion] Reposting my query about CGL-LSB compliance
mika at osdl.org
Thu Feb 13 14:36:07 PST 2003
Just reinforcing what Craig said...
On to, 2003-02-13 at 13:45, Craig Thomas wrote:
> Therefore, it made perfect sense that for any distribution to meet the
> OSDL CGL specifications, it was best if that distribution also became
> LSB certified. If that happened, then by default CGL requirement 1.1
> LSB compliance is met.
Yep, the only way for a distro to claim it is meeting our requirement
for LSB compliance is to get the distro in question listed on LSB's page
of certified distros:
More information about the cgl_discussion