[cgl_discussion] TIPC on 2.5.62

Lynch, Rusty rusty.lynch at intel.com
Tue Feb 18 15:35:54 PST 2003


Have you considered setting up a bitkeeper tree for TIPC 2.5 kernel
development?  It is super easy to get a public account on bitkeeper and it
will make keeping up with the latest greatest 2.5 kernel a lot easier.

    --rustyl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Cherry [mailto:cherry at osdl.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:32 PM
> To: Mika Kukkonen
> Cc: cgl_discussion at osdl.org; jon.maloy at ericsson.com
> Subject: Re: [cgl_discussion] TIPC on 2.5.62
> 
> BTW, Mika entered the patch in the patch lifecycle manager (PLM) and he
> is currently running STP regressions (not that any STP regressions will
> show up a TIPC problem).  Anyway, you can download the patch from the
> following...
> 
> http://www.osdl.org/cgi-bin/plm?module=patch_info&patch_id=1570
> 
> Watch out.  Mika is having a hack attack! :)
> 
> John
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 15:18, Mika Kukkonen wrote:
> > I did some low down dirty hacking on tipc-0.92 (still available at
> > http://tipc.sourceforge.net/tipc-0.92.tar.gz), on a single purpose to
> > make tipc compile against 2.5 kernels.
> >
> > I was succesfull (the compressed diff and diffstat are in
> > http://www.osdl.org/archive/mika/), but:
> >   a) it is not even a module currently
> >   b) I just made it to compile; I am sure for example that the
> >      socket_api.c is badly broken.
> >   c) I have not even booted this kernel, as like I said, my purpose
> >      was just to get it to compile.
> > So you have been warned; try to boot this on your own risk.
> >
> > I'll be mucking around it some more to remove more of C++-isms out of it
> > and make other changes so that it could have some chance of even getting
> > kernel people look into it.
> >
> > And by the way, I renamed most of non-core files, and run Lindent on all
> > files, so it does not make much sense to try to back port this to
> > tipc-0.93.
> >
> > --MiKu
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cgl_discussion mailing list
> > cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
> > http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cgl_discussion mailing list
> cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
> http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion



More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list