[cgl_discussion] IPv6 MIBs/SNMP requirements/support

Zou, Yixiong yixiong.zou at intel.com
Thu Feb 20 15:38:21 PST 2003

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Venkata Jagana [mailto:jagana at us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 3:18 PM
> To: Zou, Yixiong
> Cc: cgl_discussion at osdl.org; 'Venkata Jagana'
> Subject: RE: [cgl_discussion] IPv6 MIBs/SNMP requirements/support
> >One more thing, do we need to implement those "set" functions?
> From a MIB definition stand point, it is always 'required'
> (unless it says optional) so that it gives the flexibility
> to control these parameters from remote mgmt station. However,
> in most cases, customers won't implement the set capability
> but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be implemented. By default,
> the 'set' functionality can be disabled and however, can only be
> enabled if desired.
> >Most of those defined in IPV6-MIB are not "required" by the MIB.
> Don't think so :) Did you see any stmt from the spec that they are not
> mandatory.
> Thanks,
> Venkat

Well, the ipv6compliance section in the IPV6-MIB file specified that 
"An agent is not required to provide write access to this object". 


They also defined that the "Min-Access == read-only". 
Yixiong Zou (yixiong.zou at intel.com)
(503) 677-4988

All views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender. 

More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list