[cgl_discussion] 01/09/2003 Poc Meeting Minutes

[Peter Badovinatz]

"Davis, Todd C" wrote:
> 
> Todd C. Davis
> These are my opinions and absolutely not official opinions of Intel Corp.

Todd,
Thank you, that's in line with what I would have hoped (and expected)
given the overall history of PCP's development.

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Badovinatz [mailto:tabmowzo at us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:59 PM
> To: Randy.Dunlap
> Cc: Lynch, Rusty; 'cgl_discussion at osdl.org'; todd.c.davis at intel.com
> Subject: Re: [cgl_discussion] 01/09/2003 Poc Meeting Minutes
> 
> [Todd Davis] ...
> 
> >
> > 4.  The comparison does a good comparison of PCP and RM, but we need
> > something that tells if/how they fulfull the CGL requirements also
> > (4.1.2 thru 4.1.5) (as asked in #1 above).
> 
> I'm looking at the Req. doc now, and the only one that I wouldn't be
> comfortable with saying is covered is the performance one (4.1.5)
> because I've not the hands on experience with that.  If Todd is
> comfortable there, then I would be too.  I think PCP well covers all of
> the other points (with limitations and future work directions as
> described by Todd.)
> [Todd Davis] The Performance Metric Collection Daemon (pmcd) meets the
> requirement. Since number of monitoring processes, Performance Metric
> Inference Engine (pmie) processes, that are created and the monitoring
> parameters such as the frequency of the sampling, configurations of pmies
> could cause this requirement to be exceeded. PCP reasonably configured to
> generate alerts would easily meet this requirement. PCP configured for
> intensive performance analysis could exceed the 1% CPU utilization limit.
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > ~Randy
> 
> Peter
> --
> Peter R. Badovinatz aka 'Wombat' -- IBM Linux Technology Center
> preferred: tabmowzo at us.ibm.com / alternate: wombat at us.ibm.com
> These are my opinions and absolutely not official opinions of IBM, Corp.

Peter
--
Peter R. Badovinatz aka 'Wombat' -- IBM Linux Technology Center
preferred: tabmowzo at us.ibm.com / alternate: wombat at us.ibm.com
These are my opinions and absolutely not official opinions of IBM, Corp.