[cgl_discussion] linux-ha as a PoC for CCM.1 Cluster Communication Service

Zhu, Yi yi.zhu at intel.com
Tue Jul 8 02:20:26 PDT 2003

Hi Julie,

Given most of the features to NO, I don't think linux-ha is still suitable
to be a PoC for the current requirement. Is it possible to change the CGL
cluster communication requirement to be more generic? I mean we don't
define approach details in the spec. For example, we just say CGL shall
provide a point-to-point and multipoint communication service but don't
specify it must use a socket-based interface; we can say CGL shall provide
a reliable communication service that detects communication failures but
don't specify the communication mode must be connection or connectionless.


On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Fleischer, Julie N wrote:
> > I found the CGL 2.0 requirement CCM.1 Cluster Communication
> > Service was
> > written with TIPC in mind. This induces linux-ha
> > (http://linux-ha.org), as another
> > PoC, can rarely provide any of the requirements. In the
> > following, I'd like to
> > discuss the gaps between linux-ha and current CGL 2.0 spec.
> > CCM.1 Cluster
> > Communication Service requirement priority 1 features one by one.
> Zhu Yi -
> Thanks for the details.  I added as much as I could to the POC list at:
> http://www.osdl.org/docs/poc_cgl_20_priority_1_solutions.xls.
> - Julie
> **These views are not necessarily those of my employer.**

More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list