[cgl_discussion] Starting point for PoC tracking of P1 items

Lynch, Rusty rusty.lynch at intel.com
Tue Jun 3 08:28:46 PDT 2003

I agree.  The notes / description column needs to be filled out more for
most of the projects.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cress, Andrew R
>Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 7:53 AM
>To: Lynch, Rusty; cgl_discussion at osdl.org
>Subject: RE: [cgl_discussion] Starting point for PoC tracking of P1
>I think we need to include more URLs in the "Project" column, many of
>projects listed have names (and should have URLs).  We don't need to
>the reader go elsewhere to find the URL.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Lynch, Rusty [mailto:rusty.lynch at intel.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 3:28 AM
>To: cgl_discussion at osdl.org
>Subject: [cgl_discussion] Starting point for PoC tracking of P1 items
>Last week in the PoC meeting Julie and I took an action item to create
>spreadsheet that would act as a starting point for tracking the
>implementations that provide P1 requirements in the soon to be release
>2.0 specification.  I am attaching an Excel spreadsheet along with a
>page generated from the spreadsheet that I believe is a starting point.
>Please take a look over the document, and bring your feedback to the
>meeting.  Questions I would ask to the crowd are:
>Does this spreadsheet include the correct fields?
>Is the data captured accurate?
>What projects are missing?
>    --rustyl

More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list