[cgl_discussion] FYI - PoC Tracking Sheets updated

Frederic Rossi (LMC) Frederic.Rossi at ericsson.ca
Wed Jun 18 04:48:17 PDT 2003

That's fine with me. Thanks for the change.

Fleischer, Julie N wrote:

>>From: Steven Dake [mailto:sdake at mvista.com]
>>I would suggest one change, which is that we need to add 
>>TimeSys to the 
>>list of targets. To enable this change, would it make sense to move 
>>Category to the top of each section (eg: category carryover, 
>>then list 
>>all of the carryover requirements)? This would give more room 
>>for adding 
>>this field without squeezing other fields.
>>From: Frederic Rossi (LMC) [mailto:Frederic.Rossi at ericsson.ca]
>>Could you please update the information regarding AEM. The 
>>uptodate web 
>>site is
>>at SF: http://aem.sourceforge.net
>>Regarding the info:
>>Status: 2.5 is supported
>>Gap: It is written that
>>"Since the original requirement was written with AEM functionality in 
>>In fact AEM is an implementation of the requirement. 
>>Otherwise we would 
>>have used
>>other alternatives.
>I have made both of these changes in the latest spreadsheet.  Let me know if you have problems with what I've done.  I added the additional "TimeSys" column and decreased font size to fit everything in.  I also added the AEM references saying that status is in development, but gap analysis is that it meets full requirements.
>- Julie
>**These views are not necessarily those of my employer.**

More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list