[cgl_discussion] FYI - PoC Tracking Sheets updated
Frederic Rossi (LMC)
Frederic.Rossi at ericsson.ca
Wed Jun 18 04:48:17 PDT 2003
Julie,
That's fine with me. Thanks for the change.
Frederic
Fleischer, Julie N wrote:
>>From: Steven Dake [mailto:sdake at mvista.com]
>>I would suggest one change, which is that we need to add
>>TimeSys to the
>>list of targets. To enable this change, would it make sense to move
>>Category to the top of each section (eg: category carryover,
>>then list
>>all of the carryover requirements)? This would give more room
>>for adding
>>this field without squeezing other fields.
>>
>>
>AND
>
>
>>From: Frederic Rossi (LMC) [mailto:Frederic.Rossi at ericsson.ca]
>>Could you please update the information regarding AEM. The
>>uptodate web
>>site is
>>at SF: http://aem.sourceforge.net
>>
>>
>>Regarding the info:
>>
>>Status: 2.5 is supported
>>
>>Gap: It is written that
>>"Since the original requirement was written with AEM functionality in
>>mind,..."
>>In fact AEM is an implementation of the requirement.
>>Otherwise we would
>>have used
>>other alternatives.
>>
>>
>
>I have made both of these changes in the latest spreadsheet. Let me know if you have problems with what I've done. I added the additional "TimeSys" column and decreased font size to fit everything in. I also added the AEM references saying that status is in development, but gap analysis is that it meets full requirements.
>
>- Julie
>**These views are not necessarily those of my employer.**
>
>
More information about the cgl_discussion
mailing list