[cgl_discussion] Re: MV open projects analysis

Steven Dake sdake at mvista.com
Tue Jun 24 13:13:20 PDT 2003


Julie

I changed the description of MontaVista's HDI project from MontaVista's 
udev-like project to "MontaVista System Device Enumeration Framework".
I also changed "bariers" to "barriers".

Other then that, everything looks good.

Thanks
-steve

Fleischer, Julie N wrote:

>>As promised, I've finally dispatched all of the items as to 
>>how we are 
>>likely to support or unlikley to support PoC projects for MontaVista 
>>software.  I also updated two errors in the document.  There are some 
>>items that are unknown that I need to contact others in my company 
>>regarding and hope to have answers on those.
>>    
>>
>
>This is great information.  I have added it to the PoC project list at http://www.osdl.org/docs/poc_cgl_20_priority_1_solutions.xls.
>
>I just noticed your line about the errors in the document.  Do you remember which projects these were for?  (I ended up just cutting and pasting the MV column just in case there was a version difference in the documents.)  I also need to update this document once we have the final CGL Spec released since I know already there have been a few P1 changes.
>
>- Julie
>
>**These views are not necessarily those of my employer.**
>
> 
>
>
>
>  
>




More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list