[cgl_discussion] cgl patches
Cress, Andrew R
andrew.r.cress at intel.com
Thu Mar 6 07:54:18 PST 2003
I've also had a need for a web page with links to affiliated CGL projects.
Some of them I found by searching on sourceforge because luckily I knew what
it should be named, but some of them are on other oss sites.
Putting this together would seem to me to be one of the most important
things to be done for CGL.
Project tracking, feature content, fixes, etc., all depend upon being able
to see the linked oss web sites. Where would the distros go to find the
possible feature content otherwise?
I'd be glad to contribute some of the ones I've found, but mostly the links
should come from the project owner/maintainers, right?
From: Dave Fuller [mailto:dave at osdl.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 3:58 PM
To: Mika Kukkonen
Cc: Ibrahim Haddad (LMC); cgl_discussion at osdl.org
Subject: RE: [cgl_discussion] cgl patches
No ETA, but it is in plan.
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 11:48, Mika Kukkonen wrote:
> On ke, 2003-03-05 at 11:22, Ibrahim Haddad (LMC) wrote:
> > Since no one is really trying to maintain the patches, I assume that
> > a case where a patch from member company A can break a patch coming
> > from member company B could exist? If so, how to prevent this?
> When CGLE and even later the CGL-kernel patch was ramped down, one
> rationale for that was that we were just duplicating the work done by
> the distro companies. So the answer to the problem you are raising is
> simply that it is _not_ CGL-WG's headache, but instead it is the distro
> companies (or some other entity's who will be creating a CGL compliant
> Linux OS) headache to resolve patch conflicts.
> I know several people think that this is not "optimal" state of affairs,
> but that just happens to be how it is, and I have no wish to go through
> again the pain and waste of effort we had with CGLE.
> > Is there somewhere a list of all needed patches and relative web sites
> > where we can go get them?
> A web page with list of CGL "affiliated" projects and links to them is
> planned for OSDL web site, but I have no ETA for that... Dave?
Dave Fuller <dave at osdl.org>
cgl_discussion mailing list
cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
More information about the cgl_discussion