[cgl_discussion] PoC concall minutes, 3/6
rusty at linux.co.intel.com
Fri Mar 14 08:12:40 PST 2003
On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 08:02, Davis, Todd C wrote:
> Why is resource monitoring a "Red flag" item?
> Red flag items:
> * AEM
> * boot cycle detection
> * live SW upgrade
> * resource monitoring
> * OpenHPI still waiting on SAF/legal stuff; resources expected to be
> available (probably all non-kernel)
> Todd C. Davis
> These are my opinions and absolutely not official opinions of Intel Corp.
My understanding is that it is flagged because we are trying to get more
NEP and Carrier input. In other words, we have a requirement, the
working group has an implementation that we believe meets the spirit of
the requirement and we feel comfortable with the state of the
implementation, now we need feedback from the people using CGL to
indicate if we are on target.
So... we are using a red flag in a more general purpose manner, not
saying that resource monitoring does not have an implementation or the
implementation is dead in the water.
More information about the cgl_discussion