[cgl_discussion] Typo in CGL requirements definition V2.0?
sdake at mvista.com
Tue Nov 11 08:41:28 PST 2003
Thanks for the errata I'll add it to the list
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 18:20, John Mehaffey wrote:
> I am going through the requirements for CGL 2.0,and have found
> what I believe to be a typo in the doc.
> Page 29, item STD.2.20 (thread safe functions) claims to be
> useful for POSIX timers, but I believe that it should read
> POSIX threads.
> Best Regards,
> John Mehaffey
> MontaVista Technical Marketing
> cgl_discussion mailing list
> cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
More information about the cgl_discussion