[cgl_discussion] Re: ATCA Requirements Take 2
John J Grana
jjg at pt.com
Wed Sep 10 10:55:38 PDT 2003
<sdake at mvista.com
John J Grana <jjg at pt.com>
09/09/2003 06:20 cc
PM cgl_discussion at osdl.org,
eric.chacron at alcatel.fr,
Richard.Somes at fci.com
Please respond to Subject
sdake at mvista.com Re: ATCA Requirements Take 2
Sorry I am late responding - the Call already happened???
What I would recommend is something like the following:
Requirement: ATCA and CompactPCI IPMI Support
The IPMI system shall implement the new IPMI commands, data structures,
and sensors defined in the ATCA specification. CompactPCI based systems
supported under this specification by implementing the ATCA IPMI command
and data structures.
As Dick Somes mentioned, the definition of IPMI for cPCI systems is not too
But, if a cPCI vendor wanted to support CGL 2.0 and forward (especially How
Swap), having them
support both IPMI and adopting the newer ATCA defined IPMI commands might
be something they
would be willing to do.
So, I would prefer we change from "ATCA" (only) to "ATCA and CompactPCI".
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 14:58, John J Grana wrote:
> Are these requirements just for ATCA? Can we also then take a shot
> CompactPCI. I realize there are lots of holes in various implementations
> CompactPCI, but I still feel strongly we need to be able to support cPCI
> (2.16 and CompacTCA) versions. Even if it means cPCI vendors will need
> 1) Support IPMI
> 2) Support some set of IPMI commands and data structures (possibly the
> we are defining for ATCA)
> If we think we can do this, we can expand the scope of Hot Swap to "ATCA
> and cPCI".
I can bring up expanding these requirements to Compact PCI systems,
however, with our current specs schedule (less then two weeks) I am
likely to be flogged tomorrow. Do you have any specific requirements
you would like to see?
> Steven Dake
> <sdake at mvista.com
> cgl_discussion at osdl.org,
> 09/09/2003 05:54 eric.chacron at alcatel.fr,
> PM jjg at pt.com, Richard.Somes at fci.com
> Please respond to
> sdake at mvista.com ATCA Requirements Take 2
> Here is take 2 of the requirements for ATCA.
> Requirement: ATCA IPMI Support
> The IPMI system shall implement the new IPMI commands, data structures,
> and sensors defined in the ATCA specification.
> Requirement: Block Device Removal
> The Linux kernel should allow removal of a block device while it is in
> use without degrading reliability of the system. The block device shall
> be removeable even if in use by an open file (fdisk /dev/sda), a raid
> volume, or a filesystem or multiples thereof.
> Requirement: shutdown systemcall integrated with ATCA system management
> The Linux kernel shall ensure that the shutdown system call uses the
> ATCA system management IPMI interface to power down the system and light
> the blue led.
> Requirement: Multiple Host Syncronized Device Hotswap
> When multiple hosts are using the same block or character device, and a
> user requests to remove the device, the device's blade wont be powered
> off and if a blue led is available, lit, until all systems in the
> collection of machines using the device have removed the device from
> their respective Linux kernel data structures.
More information about the cgl_discussion