[cgl_discussion] Question about getting an LSP, OSDL CGL compliant
cherry at osdl.org
Wed Jun 30 09:59:08 PDT 2004
Welcome to the cgl_discussion mailing list.
Linux distributors are the entities that would validate compliance with
CGL specifications. For CGL 1.1, there was no formal compliance
process, but you could have the discussion with your Linux vendor about
how they comply with their standard products and support packages.
For CGL 2.0, there will is a registration process where Linux vendors
will disclose the results of their self-registration. Stay tuned on
this one. Several distros are actively going through this process.
When results are available, links to this disclosure will be posted on
the OSDL site.
Bottom line, contact your Linux vendor.
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 07:01, Staples Todd-G3794C wrote:
> Hello there friends,
> I am very new to this list (just joined about 1.5 minutes ago) but I
> have a very pressing question for you all.
> I am interested in finding out if there are organizations out there
> (companies and/or corporations) that specialize in taking an LSP and
> certifying whether it is OSDL CGL 1.1 or 2.0 compliant. Do such
> organizations exist and can any of you point me in the right direction
> to find such places?
> Also, I'm interested in finding a comprehensive test suite that can or
> attempts to verify whether an LSP is CGL compliant. This statement is
> much to the same regard as the previous one but more directed at doing
> the work myself rather than another organization.
> I guess at this point most likely you've gained from reading this that
> I have an LSP, and I want to get the OSDL CGL 1.1 or 2.0 compliance
> stamp on it. How do i go about doing that in the most cost effective
> and timely manner? Has anyone had any luck doing the same thing?
> Thank you so much for any comments that come my way.
> Todd Staples
> Senior Software Verification Engineer
> Motorola Computer Group
> Southborough, Massachusetts
> toddstaples at motorola.com
> cgl_discussion mailing list
> cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
More information about the cgl_discussion