[cgl_discussion] ATCA deferred items perhaps move to different
spec areas servicability and clustering affected
mehaf at mvista.com
Tue Mar 23 11:21:15 PST 2004
I got a question about the CSM.atca feature from Marconi.
Do we support this in CGE 3.1?
Steven Dake wrote:
> 1. rename PLT.atca.2 to Block Device Removal and move to serviceability
> 2. rename CSM.atca to Multiple Host Syncronized Device Hotswap and move
> to clustering
> I have rethought the references and believe CSM.atca should probably end
> up in the clustering section since it is not a ATCA specific
> requirement. We can write an ATCA specific portion which depends on the
> specialized ATCA hardware requirements that would depend on CSM.atca.
> cgl_discussion mailing list
> cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
More information about the cgl_discussion