[cgl_discussion] ATCA deferred items perhaps move to different spec areas servicability and clustering affected

John Mehaffey mehaf at mvista.com
Tue Mar 23 11:21:15 PST 2004

I got a question about the CSM.atca feature from Marconi.

Do we support this in CGE 3.1?


Steven Dake wrote:

> 1. rename PLT.atca.2 to Block Device Removal and move to serviceability
> 2. rename CSM.atca to Multiple Host Syncronized Device Hotswap and move
> to clustering
> Terrance
> I have rethought the references and believe CSM.atca should probably end
> up in the clustering section since it is not a ATCA specific
> requirement.  We can write an ATCA specific portion which depends on the
> specialized ATCA hardware requirements that would depend on CSM.atca.
> Thanks
> -steve 
> _______________________________________________
> cgl_discussion mailing list
> cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
> http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion

More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list