[cgl_discussion] ATCA deferred items perhaps move to different
spec areas servicability and clustering affected
John Mehaffey
mehaf at mvista.com
Tue Mar 23 11:21:15 PST 2004
Steve,
I got a question about the CSM.atca feature from Marconi.
Do we support this in CGE 3.1?
-mehaf
Steven Dake wrote:
> 1. rename PLT.atca.2 to Block Device Removal and move to serviceability
>
> 2. rename CSM.atca to Multiple Host Syncronized Device Hotswap and move
> to clustering
>
> Terrance
> I have rethought the references and believe CSM.atca should probably end
> up in the clustering section since it is not a ATCA specific
> requirement. We can write an ATCA specific portion which depends on the
> specialized ATCA hardware requirements that would depend on CSM.atca.
>
> Thanks
> -steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> cgl_discussion mailing list
> cgl_discussion at lists.osdl.org
> http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion
More information about the cgl_discussion
mailing list