[cgl_discussion] Re: [cgl_registration] LSB 2.0 for CGL 2.0?

Mika Kukkonen (Nokia-NET/Espoo) mika.r.kukkonen at nokia.com
Wed Sep 8 09:03:47 PDT 2004


ext La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote:

> The LSB folks have been encouraging us to consider LSB 2.0 Certification
> instead of LSB 1.3.  LSB 2.0 is due for final release any day now.  Three
> months after that release it will no longer be possible to get new LSB 
> 1.3
> certifications.
>
> I recommend permitting LSB 2.0 Certification to meet CGL STD.1.0.
>
> I suggest this as a topic for the F2F.  I won't be there, but Manas 
> Saksena
> will be representing TimeSys.
>
To my understanding there is some controversy between several distros
and LSB, see this article: http://lwn.net/Articles/96347/

So I think a real evaluation of LSB 2.0 needs to be made before
CGL-WG jumps into that mess.

Mika

-- 
Mika Kukkonen = mika.r.kukkonen at nokia.com
NET/ST/SWT: Senior Specialist, Open Source SW
Cell (UTC+2): +358-50-486-0013




More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list