[cgl_discussion] Re: [cgl_registration] LSB 2.0 for CGL 2.0?
Mika Kukkonen (Nokia-NET/Espoo)
mika.r.kukkonen at nokia.com
Wed Sep 8 09:03:47 PDT 2004
ext La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote:
> The LSB folks have been encouraging us to consider LSB 2.0 Certification
> instead of LSB 1.3. LSB 2.0 is due for final release any day now. Three
> months after that release it will no longer be possible to get new LSB
> I recommend permitting LSB 2.0 Certification to meet CGL STD.1.0.
> I suggest this as a topic for the F2F. I won't be there, but Manas
> will be representing TimeSys.
To my understanding there is some controversy between several distros
and LSB, see this article: http://lwn.net/Articles/96347/
So I think a real evaluation of LSB 2.0 needs to be made before
CGL-WG jumps into that mess.
Mika Kukkonen = mika.r.kukkonen at nokia.com
NET/ST/SWT: Senior Specialist, Open Source SW
Cell (UTC+2): +358-50-486-0013
More information about the cgl_discussion