[cgl_discussion] Re: [cgl_specs] Multipath I/O requirement gap
dmo at osdl.org
Wed Sep 15 15:05:11 PDT 2004
Looking over your gap analysis, it looks quite good.
I've got a hardware setup here at OSDL that is similar
to yours. In the next week, I'll be walking through an
exercise similar to yours. I've got a system with two fibre
channel switches, with a dual fabric, and two IBM FastT200
disk arrays configured as JBOD. If I come across any
additions to your work, I'll post them.
The DCL project has a need for gap analysis on multipath similar
to that for CGL. I think that your gap analysis is a good one,
and I'll move to have it included in the DCL documentation.
If anyone else has interesting configurations to test, this
would be a good time to give feed back.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 10:16:22AM -0700, Caushik, Ramesh wrote:
> Please see attached report of my gap analysis of the
> device-mapper based multipath I/O driver targeted towards the CGL 3.0
> AVL 8.1 Multipath I/O requirement. Look forward to your comments
> and suggestions. Regards,
> <<Gap Analysis of the Multipath I_O.ZIP>>
> "Views expressed are mine, and not those of Intel Corporation"
More information about the cgl_discussion