[cgl_discussion] 3.0 Security Requirements

Scott Lowrey slowrey at nextone.com
Wed Apr 27 17:56:16 PDT 2005

Got it.  Thanks very much, Steve.

Steven Dake wrote:

>We had intended to release the CGL security specification with the CGL
>3.1 requirements.  The security specification at the 3.0 publish time
>was a work in progress.  I am not aware of a draft 3.0 security
>specification.  If you would like to see the 3.1 draft, which is
>probably what you are really interested in, take a look here:

More information about the cgl_discussion mailing list