[Chaoss-Board] CHAOSS Goals 2020
daniel.izquierdo.cortazar at gmail.com
Wed Feb 12 09:57:07 UTC 2020
Sorry for being late to this conversation. After FOSDEM recovery is slow :).
Aligned with what Andrea proposed, I was involved years ago in some EU
funded projects and in some of the cases benchmarking was kind of an
interesting approach as this brings context to any potential discussion.
I remember there's in another CHAOSS thread a discussion about having a
software catalogue, so the question I may have if I'm deciding to use
certain software is how this compares to others.
Benchmarking is not about saying this is good or bad, but you can compare
certain aspects (e.g., the current metrics release) with your own specific
project, and this will show how far you are from the average.
I see value in this approach as CHAOSS brings context to the metrics as
this aggregates project/organization/ecosystem level. And this is useful
for the following stakeholders:
1- Open Source Foundations, OSS project managers, community managers, etc,
as this may help understand if compared to others, and lessons learned can
flow from one project to another (e.g., why are you so efficient in the
code review process? or You're very stable in the code production, this
helps a lot to do certain estimations, how can Iearn from you?).
2- This might be useful for OSPOs as this would be a place to have a look
at and compare if they want the projects that matter to them with well
known projects. And this would be useful for organizations consuming the
software as well.
3- From the InnerSource world, this is interesting if we go and analyze
specific use cases such as transparency, communication, etc, as this will
help to compare how far they are from the 'ideal' world.
I can elaborate a bit more each of the areas if needed :).
El mar., 11 feb. 2020 a las 21:40, Matt Germonprez (<germonprez at gmail.com>)
> Agreed. Thanks Andrea. I'll certainly bring this up, not only in the board
> meeting, but also in the CHAOSS community calls.
> Also, thanks for the kind words on the metrics release. A lot of work by
> excellent people :)
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 2:16 PM Georg Link <linkgeorg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Andrea,
>> Thank you for the positive feedback on the metrics release.
>> What you are describing sounds connected to two threads of discussion
>> that surface occasionally and we have not made much progress on either:
>> 1. Composite Metrics - metrics that are combining (with weights) other
>> metrics into one. We have some examples in this current release.
>> 2. Maturity Models (or other names) - a collection of composite metrics
>> (simplified). For example this CHAOSScon talk
>> https://youtu.be/NaC2obrH8vg?t=551 (sorry, I was the speaker).
>> I do think that what you are describing has value and a place in the
>> CHAOSS discussion. :)
>> On Feb 11, 2020, at 8:23 AM, Andrea Gallo <andrea.gallo at linaro.org>
>> Hello Matt, hello all,
>> thank you for your email.
>> I will join the board meeting via conf call most probably as I shall be
>> at a different HPC event the very same days.
>> First of all, let me share that the recent revamp of the metrics page is
>> amazing, absolutely fantastic work! I could browse all metrics by category,
>> read them one by one, etc. I loved the verbose description for each metric
>> about its use case, etc.
>> Congratulations for the hard work and the very neat outcome to the entire
>> team, it is an amazing progress!
>> About goals for 2020, I would like to raise one point for debate. I
>> remember we discussed this already two years ago in Sonoma so apologies if
>> this sounds misplaced. We agreed to work on metrics as tools to evaluate
>> the success of an open source project but at the same time we agreed to
>> refrain from providing any judgement or comparison of projects.
>> Now given that the metrics are growing in number, scope and complexity,
>> my suggestion as a goal for 2020 would be to propose that we create KPIs or
>> weighted use of metrics by category in order to come up with some "label"
>> or "attribute" for each one. Eg. based on the metrics in the GMD category,
>> could we process and combine them in order to evaluate a "growth" or
>> "maturity" or "decline" label?
>> We would not rate a project as successful or failing yet we would provide
>> some guidance for each category: growing / mature / declining, safe or at
>> risk based on governance, license compliance, etc. Large outreach vs niche
>> project based on diversity, geography, etc.
>> I think this may become more valuable as the metrics grow further.
>> Happy to accept criticism if this sounds like a bad idea :-)
>> Maybe add this to the agenda?
>> Thank you
>> [image: Linaro] <https://www.linaro.org/>
>> Andrea Gallo | *VP of Membership Development*
>> T: +39.338.4075993 | andrea.gallo at linaro.org
>> Skype: agallo70 | WeChat: andreagallo70
>> On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 16:30, Matt Germonprez <germonprez at gmail.com>
>>> Hi CHAOSS Board Members,
>>> As a small primer for the board meeting in March, it would be great if
>>> you could give me a 1 or 2 goals you are hoping the CHAOSS project can
>>> achieve in 2020. You can send them directly to me or to the list. I'd love
>>> to get your input.
>>> Mutual of Omaha Professor
>>> Information Systems
>>> College of Information Science & Technology
>>> University of Nebraska Omaha
>>> CV: https://bit.ly/2kftONr
>>> CHAOSS Board Member
>>> Omaha Parks Foundation Board Member
>>> he / him / his
>>> CHAOSS-members mailing list
>>> CHAOSS-members at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> CHAOSS-members mailing list
>> CHAOSS-members at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> Georg Link
> Mutual of Omaha Professor
> Information Systems
> College of Information Science & Technology
> University of Nebraska Omaha
> CV: https://bit.ly/2kftONr
> CHAOSS Board Member
> Omaha Parks Foundation Board Member
> he / him / his
> CHAOSS-members mailing list
> CHAOSS-members at lists.linuxfoundation.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CHAOSS-members