[Chaoss-software] [Oss-health-metrics] [CoC working group] Invite to Code of Conduct working group

[Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona]

I've added both the OpenStack CoC and the CCC to the list of codes to
analyze. The Contributor Covenant was already in the list.

Saludos,

	Jesus

On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 10:56 -0800, Raymond Paik wrote:
> OpenStack takes a similar approach.  It's mostly aspirational, but
> also lists unacceptable behaviors.
> 
> See: https://www.openstack.org/legal/community-code-of-conduct/ 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Sean Goggins <s at goggins.com> wrote:
> > Hi All:
> > 
> > I agree in general with the principle of keeping statements
> > positive. I do not know, however, if “staying positive” is an act
> > of not acknowledging the most common unacceptable behaviors
> > experienced historically in open source software projects.  
> > 
> > I do not have answers, just a question.  GitHub is using 2
> > different terms of services templates now, and these may be worth
> > considering. 
> > 
> > One is the contributor covenant: 
> > 
> > https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.ht
> > ml
> > 
> > The other is the citizen code of conduct:
> > 
> > http://citizencodeofconduct.org/
> > 
> > Both enumerate historically unacceptable behaviors.  
> > 
> > My opinion is that GitHub is working hard to set the standard for
> > inclusivity in open source projects by making these code of conduct
> > templates available for all their projects now.  
> > 
> > I ask that we consider the possibility that explicitly noting
> > historically problematic behaviors might be viewed positively by
> > folks who have had to deal with them. 
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Sean 
> > 
> > > On Nov 15, 2017, at 9:14 AM, Raymond Paik <rpaik at linuxfoundation.
> > > org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Thanks that makes sense and agree :-)
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Georg Link <glink at unomaha.edu>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Thanks, Ray and Jesus. I have nothing to add. 
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona <jg
> > > > b at bitergia.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 21:48 -0800, Raymond Paik wrote:
> > > > > > Thanks Georg....  Sorry I could not be at the meeting.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A clarifying question on one of the items.  When you say
> > > > > "digital", I
> > > > > > assume that means the CoC not only cover behaviors at in-
> > > > > person
> > > > > > events/events (in physical spaces), but also behaviors
> > > > > online (e-
> > > > > > mail, conference calls, etc.)?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes. In fact, that "digital behaviour" is more important for
> > > > > us that
> > > > > "in-place", since the former would be far more frequent.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This comes in part from the fact that, due maybe to
> > > > > historical reasons,
> > > > > some CoC could seem designed for in-place situations, with
> > > > > only some
> > > > > mentions or "extensions" for digital situations.
> > > > > 
> > > > >         Jesus
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Oss-health-metrics mailing list
> > > Oss-health-metrics at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oss-health-met
> > > rics
> > 
> > Sean P. Goggins
> > Associate Professor, Computer Science
> > Director, Data Science and Analytics Masters Program
> > University of Missouri
> > http://www.seangoggins.net
> > 
> > Computer Science:  http://engineering.missouri.edu/cs/ 
> > Data Science & Analytics: http://dsa.missouri.edu 
> > MU Informatics Institute http://muii.missouri.edu 
> > visit: http://www.sociotech.net
> > visit: http://osshealth.io (for ghdata OSS Metrics
> > Software) [Sloan Foundation]
> > visit: http://chaoss.community (for open source health
> > metrics) [Sloan Foundation]
> > visit: http://mhs.missouri.edu (for mission hydro sci!) [i3 & IES]
> > visit: http://ocdx.io (for the open collaboration data exchange!) 
> >  [National Science Foundation]
> > visit: http://sociallycompute.io (for code like things
> > and Group Informatics) [National Science Foundation]
> > ‌‌
> > "I finally comprehended the difference between critical thinking
> > and its opposite.  Technical people are not dumb, quite the
> > contrary, but technical curricula rarely include critical
> > thinking in the sense I have in mind.  Critical thinking means that
> > you can, so to speak, see your glasses.  You can look at the world,
> > or you can back up and look at the framework of concepts
> > and assumptions and practices *through* which you look at the
> > world."
> > -- Phil Agre, http://wtf.tw/ref/agre.html
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chaoss-software mailing list
> Chaoss-software at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chaoss-software
-- 
Bitergia: http://bitergia.com
/me at Twitter: https://twitter.com/jgbarah