[CHAOSS] How decisions are made (was: Opening discussion on using Discourse Forum for CHAOSS)
eirwin at mozilla.com
Tue Nov 20 18:30:27 UTC 2018
Documentation of who makes decisions, their role(s), and the process they
follow is half the battle to gaining trust, and increased participation in
decision-making. Most of the time people are not interested in
challenging, but they do want to be consulted. This is a great talk from
on that topic.
Suggest never saying 'that's how most open source projects' do things, when
referencing governance discussions.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:16 AM dmg <dmg at turingmachine.org> wrote:
> > I don't think this has always being the case, but I would say
> > that
> > usually people argue in favor or against, and propose different
> > decisions, in the mailing list, and then during the calls,
> > consensus
> > areas are explored until a decision is perceived to have
> > consensus. But
> > other people who has participated in these processes may say too
> > if
> > this matches their experience.
> hi Jesus
> with all due respect, I think most decisions are not
> reached. Simply, the people who are in charge of them
> enact them according to the input of others.
> In other words: the doers control what gets done and how, with the
> possibility that they take into
> consideration the input of others.
> there have been some decisions (few) that require a vote of the
> board. But in general,
> we have silent consent.
> I think this is perfectly fine. It is just the way that most open
> source projects work.
> perhaps at some point, the board might get the ability to veto
> actions by CHAOSS members via a majority
> > Up to now, my feeling is this worked well. But maybe it is not
> > scaling
> > up as we have more people involved in general, people active in
> > working
> > groups, the set of people attending all calls, and participating
> > in all
> > mailing lists, is getting shorter and shorter (as a fraction of
> > the
> > total people involved in CHAOSS as a whole).
> I think we all have our opinions on what needs/should be done. But
> unless we are willing to do it,
> we should not get on the way of those doing it.
> There are situations where actions of CHAOSS members on behalf of
> CHAOSS might veer outside the goals of the project (which is
> subjective---I grant, personally
> I have see at least one instance of this happening). This might
> require a process to bring a vote to the validity of those
> > * First, comment on your feelings about the decision making
> > process, in
> > this specific case and in general. If many of us think that we
> > need to
> > decide more formally on a process, we can work on having one. If
> > not,
> > we can stick to the current way.
> > * Second, if somebody feels that in this specific case we don't
> > have a
> > consensus, we can either talk it more broadly, or raising it to
> > the
> > CHAOSS Board. We have a meeting in a week, so this would be
> > timely.
> > What do you think?
> see above. I have addressed both points.
> > Jesus.
> > --
> Daniel M. German "Language alone protects us from
> the scariness
> of things with no names.
> Toni Morrison -> Language alone is meditation. "
> dmg (at) uvic (dot) ca
> replace (at) with @ and (dot) with .
Emma Irwin (she/her)
Open Innovation Team
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CHAOSS