[CHAOSS] [wg-gmd] Meeting Notes - September 9th 2018

[Sean Goggins]

Yes. As long as the working groups don’t delete the stuff from other working groups like we did initially in GMD (i.e. follow D & I’s process instead) then the integration as copy and paste is easier to manage. 

Technically I think branches are what the lords at GitHub intended for circumstances like these (i.e. the working groups are more like feature branches than forks), but it’s hardly a hill worth dying on. :) 

Forward!!

Sean P. Goggins
(816) 368-1364
http://www.seangoggins.net
visit: http://www.sociotech.net
visit: http://www.datafactories.org 

"I force people to have coffee with me, just because I don't trust that a friendship can be maintained without any other senses besides a computer or cellphone screen.”
— John Cusack


On Oct 2, 2018, at 13:09, Matt Germonprez <germonprez at gmail.com> wrote:

That makes good sense... the last part. If we can keep the naming aligned between work groups, that would be great. Does this capture it? 

-Work Group (D&I, GMD, Risk, Value)
--Focus Areas (Specific to WG)
---Metrics/Methods (Specific to Focus Area)

Matt


> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 12:45 PM Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona <jgb at bitergia.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 12:14 -0500, Kevin Lumbard wrote:
> > [...]
> > 
> > GMD work processes need to be ironed out ( Branch vs Separate Repo)
> >  There are pros and cons for working in a Branch vs a Separate Repo
> > Arguments can be made in the mailing list and we can vote or reply to
> > reach consensus. There is an existing thread on this topic.
> 
> [Some notes specific to GMD after the CHAOSS meeting today]
> 
> Today, during the weekly CHAOSS meeting, we were talking about this. We
> agreed to go on working on a separate repo for now, and reevaluate
> during the next CHAOSSCon. So, I think we should come back to our gmd-
> repo.
> 
> In addition, we proposed to use the naming they are using in D&I for
> what we call areas of analysis, "focus areas" (during the meeting I
> said "category", but now I realize "category" is "GMD", and "areas of
> analysis" is what is akin to "focus areas in D&I").
> 
> Saludos,
> 
>         Jesus.
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> Bitergia: http://bitergia.com
> /me at Twitter: https://twitter.com/jgbarah
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CHAOSS mailing list
> CHAOSS at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chaoss


-- 
Mutual of Omaha Associate Professor
Information Systems 
College of Information Science & Technology 
University of Nebraska Omaha
he / him / his
https://goo.gl/E87KdK

_______________________________________________
CHAOSS mailing list
CHAOSS at lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chaoss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/chaoss/attachments/20181002/bd185561/attachment.html>