Herbert Poetzl <herbert at 13thfloor.at> writes: > I'd prefer pid_n{s,amespace} too, as it resembles the > function more closely ... Yes either pid_ns or pspace. task_ns is just wrong. Anyway from what I can tell we are getting a little ahead of ourselves and not handing the fundamentals. We haven't killed the pid_t's yet and that is the hard part. Eric