[PATCH] net: Add etun driver

Tue Apr 10 02:18:54 PDT 2007

On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 09:52 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> Shouldn't be a problem either. Creating the device atomically also
> prevents that anything else is setting them UP before they're fully
> configured.

How would you do it generically then? I'm absolutely not opposed to the
idea but for now haven't seen how to do it.

johannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/attachments/20070410/e5d15493/attachment-0001.pgp