[PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death

[Kirill Korotaev]

Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/01, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
>>>	If the main thread is exiting, but is not the last thread in the
>>>	group, should we let it exit and let the next thread in the group
>>>	the reaper of the pid ns ?
>>
>>Well, what happens with a multithreaded init today?
> 
> 
> As it was already discussed, the current code is buggy, and should be
> fixed.

I'm not that sure it MUST be fixed. There are no multi-threaded init's anywhere.
Oleg, does it worth changing without reasons?

Thanks,
Kirill